Ten questions about your own plan — preset answers, nothing typed, nothing stored. The verdict names your pathway, where the plan leaks, the weight of your ask, and the failure mode to watch. Ninety seconds.
Runs on The Attention Continuum v1.1Scoring shown in plain words — no black boxVerdict: working diagnosis, not a lab result
0 of 10 answered
Before anything — the zeroth question
The framework's own boundary: the four pathways apply only where attention is the scarce input. Answer honestly — this question can end the diagnostic.
Question 0 · the boundary
In your category, do consumers make a real, contested choice — or do defaults, necessity and distribution decide?
Think UPI: 85% of retail digital payments, built by rails and defaults — campaigns existed; they didn't decide the outcome. If that's your category, attention design isn't your lever.
The four conditions
One question per pathway — answer for the plan you're actually running or writing.
Condition 1 · Borrow
Does a repeated behaviour with a felt tension already exist — one your product plausibly resolves?
Sprite × eating heat. Cadbury × Diwali gifting. The ritual must be real and the fit must not be forced.
Condition 2 · Shrink
Is the behaviour you're requesting bigger than the attention and trust actually available to you?
"Switch your bank" vs "add a safe second account." If the ask outweighs the trust, size is the problem — not reach.
Condition 3 · Build
Have you accumulated behaviour or data worth mirroring back — with a natural calendar slot for it?
Wrapped mirrors a year of listening every December. Big Billion Days manufactured its own October. No accumulation, no ritual.
Condition 4 · Rent
Is a cultural moment about to concentrate your exact audience's attention?
A tournament, a festival, an award season. Renting works — CRED spiked sign-ups 6–7× — but rented attention leaves with the moment.
The weight of the ask
Whether people enact doesn't depend only on the pathway — it depends on how heavy the ask itself is. Four quick reads on what you're asking people to do.
Weight 1 · Price
The economic sacrifice — what does saying yes cost them?
Weight 2 · Commitment
How long does the decision bind them — and can they undo it?
Reversible trials weigh little. Contracts, switching, durables weigh a lot — resale value lightens the load.
Weight 3 · Effort
How many steps, minutes and mental hoops between intent and done?
Weight 4 · Identity
What does doing this say about them — status, stigma, or nothing?
The readiness check
Question 10 · conversion architecture
When the attention arrives, is the machinery to convert it already built — landing, trial, onboarding, supply?
Captured attention that never converts is the most expensive failure in the system.